GLEAN SOURCE-FACING JACKET — OHC_2439 page 57 — George Hunter and Charles Juzan 1 white annotations ROLE — GOVERNING SOURCE JACKET, historical manuscript page 57 STATE — active; the current control is stated here; preserved correction passes remain provenance GOVERNS / CONCERNS — one historical manuscript page and its source-visible row states CURRENT — OHC_2439 and OHC_2440 are alternate representations of the same historical manuscript page 57, not independent witnesses. OHC_2441 carries manuscript page 58 under its own jacket. CURRENT READINGS — PL:p57:r10 George Hunter: `1 white]`; PL:p57:r29 Charles Juzan: `1 white. 20 Slaves.` Page 57 adds 2 observed Whites and 20 observed Slaves; the surviving observed subtotal through page 57 is 13 Whites / 43 Slaves; the district account remains open. SUPERSEDES — earlier wording that treated OHC_2440 as the untested page-58 forward seam ROAD HOME — Public Lands — Whole-Document Corpus → this jacket → OHC_2439 / OHC_2440 source representations OPEN — maker and timing of the smaller annotations; why page 57 has two representations; exact representation genealogy; district reconciliation and unresolved captured-edge losses Status: DIRECT-SOURCE PAGE JACKET — ONE MANUSCRIPT PAGE — BOUNDED ANNOTATION PASS — DUPLICATE CUSTODY AND DERIVATIVES CONTROLLED Maker: Glean Date: 2026-09-05 Corpus: Public Lands — Whole-Document Corpus / quoted-title Choctaw Treaty farm return Visible manuscript page: 57 Historical-object boundary: one manuscript page within a continued multi-page return. This pass does not claim completeness of the larger return and does not supply a full diplomatic transcription of page 57. METHOD CONTROL This pass began from EARTHLY_HANDS_SOURCE_WORK_FRONT_DOOR.md (Drive ID 1vRy-G6WBcr7X1cH7bhSFEtXgmtPS15zF) and SOURCE WORK METHOD — full strength, exact reach — source to synthesis (Drive ID 1gzPONf6neA2bR6_IPIOQkpsWO3g1t3ryFclPwvbrmFc). Object first; source face governs; repeated representations do not become witnesses; source / derivative / transcription / interpretation remain distinct; blanks stay blank; corrections remain visible while active state is repaired. A bounded Drive search for OHC_2439 returned the two custody PDFs, the two same-title Quoin derivatives, receipts, and no equivalent source-facing page-57 jacket. This jacket therefore represents the underlying manuscript face rather than creating separate jackets for PDF, PNG, or Quoin forms. EXACT SOURCE / REPRESENTATION FOOTING Custody object A: - filename: OHC_2439.pdf - Drive ID: 1tzqHo9-4_B2t02qgBPEM4teQQXz9xjp_ - parent: Source objects — received batch 1 — OHC 2408–2518 - parent folder ID: 1qBiU33LC1FXr2n7X1CrvtNrx7qennMdA - size: 271,087 bytes Custody object B: - filename: OHC_2439.pdf - Drive ID: 1LEc2vVFTqk_pPGtQn4uoU4d36Msih697 - parent: Legacy mixed source population — includes Public Lands and 1899 Document 13693 faces - parent folder ID: 1hMt2btk4jNB3Iz-kh5k_gCqHRFmRQ5kI - size: 271,087 bytes Both stored PDF payloads were streamed in this pass. They are byte-for-byte identical and each produced SHA-256: 3a1f527f8faf4a267d9ed0eadc0d565e9a9ed2b6a8386659f287c7ce1c2994c3 They are two custody routes to one matching PDF payload and one manuscript-page witness, not two independent witnesses. Admitted study representation used for direct visual reading: - filename: OHC_2439.png - Drive ID: 1Di9G_RMb8skavPkMGnj0dhnozIJnLC-7 - parent: 76 Distinct Study Surfaces - parent folder ID: 11dgrYlwyeRgfaKLlKo16ASepGwH0fjRh - size: 1,428,367 bytes - operation: direct-extraction study representation of the source face; not a second historical source. Existing derivative transcriptions: - OHC_2439 form of return Choctaw Treaty farms page 57 — Quoin.md — Drive ID 1kfP3_ay_QB_NUedo_R-O0B_pFmU1u1_u — parent 1komb4v11M9baULEpk3w3owolFF99m2-F - same-title duplicate derivative — Drive ID 1ZUs28L8EkxEz-SjF22aaKZTtknQM3Fgz — parent 1RSoGuuT4le3VVUj3FBedIWNhQcaOEjUl The connector-readable text of the two Quoin objects is identical. They remain repeated derivative text and do not add evidentiary weight by repetition. PAGE IDENTITY AND 56→57 SEAM The admitted face visibly carries manuscript page number 57 at upper left and continues the ruled “Public Lands — No 1 — Form of a Return — Continued — Location under the Choctaw Treaty” form. Fieldglass’s existing OHC_2438 jacket directly establishes manuscript page 56 under the same continued form. Consecutive visible pagination and form identity earn a bounded 56 → 57 pagination/form seam only. No person, family, tract, locality, acreage, category count, annotation, identity, ownership, or legal relation is inherited across the turn merely because the pages are consecutive. WORKSHOP ROW INDEX For this jacket only, Glean counts the visible body rows top-to-bottom as PL:p57:r01–r36. These are workshop navigation indices, not source-written row numbers. They do not change the manuscript object. LOAD-BEARING DIRECT SOURCE FINDING A — PL:p57:r10 — GEORGE HUNTER The source row reads “George Hunter.” It visibly carries an entire-family count of 5. The cultivated-acre, over-16, under-10, and total-acre fields on this row are not converted from dots/blanks into zero. In the locality area, immediately before the row’s principal literal ditto material, the manuscript visibly carries smaller left-set writing: “1 white]” The closing bracket-like stroke is source-visible. No balancing opening bracket is supplied. The row then retains literal “do” / “do” locality-direction states rather than an expanded place-name transcription. The General Remarks field on the same row reads, at source force: “Provided for in supplement—1/2 section.” The duplicate Quoin text gives George Hunter’s locality annotation as “[white]”, omitting the source-visible leading numeral 1 and supplying an opening bracket not visible on the admitted face. Active source-facing reading: “1 white]”. Quoin’s state remains preserved as derivative history/navigation only. LOAD-BEARING DIRECT SOURCE FINDING B — PL:p57:r29 — CHARLES JUZAN The source row reads “Charles Juzan.” It visibly carries: - entire family: 26 - males over 16 years: 2 - cultivated-acre field: dotted/blank; no zero adopted - under-10 field: dotted/blank; no zero adopted - total acres: 1280 In the locality area the manuscript visibly carries smaller writing before the principal locality: “1 white. 20 Slaves.” followed by the principal locality wording: “Tombigbee river.” The General Remarks field on the same row visibly reads: “Benachitta; Tombigbee Bluff. 2 sects.” The duplicate Quoin text renders the annotation as “[white 20 slaves.” Direct inspection supports a leading numeral 1, a period after “white”, and no source-visible opening bracket at this point. Active source-facing reading at the annotation edge: “1 white. 20 Slaves.” Quoin’s flattened form remains derivative history only. SOURCE / DERIVATIVE / INTERPRETATION BOUNDARY Source-stated / source-visible: - page 57 under the continued Public Lands return form; - George Hunter as an occurrence-level name on r10; - George Hunter row: family 5; smaller “1 white]” writing; literal locality dittos; “Provided for in supplement—1/2 section.” - Charles Juzan as an occurrence-level name on r29; - Charles Juzan row: family 26; males over 16 = 2; smaller “1 white. 20 Slaves.” writing; “Tombigbee river.”; total acres 1280; “Benachitta; Tombigbee Bluff. 2 sects.” Derivative: - OHC_2439.png is a study representation of the manuscript face. - the two Quoin files are derivative transcriptions/navigation aids. - PL:p57:r01–r36 row labels are Glean navigation indices derived by top-to-bottom counting. - image crops/contrast enlargement used during this pass were unretained inspection derivatives and are not historical evidence. Interpretation / exact reach: The page contains at least two rows with smaller locality-area category/count writing that begins with “1 white”; one of those two also continues “20 Slaves.” This establishes recurrence on page 57 itself at the source-layout level. It does not by itself explain the administrative purpose, authorship, date, accounting rule, household relation, or legal meaning of those annotations. FINDINGS - OHC_2439 is visible manuscript page 57 of the continued Public Lands / Choctaw Treaty farm return. - The two stored OHC_2439 PDFs inspected are byte-identical custody copies of one payload and one manuscript-page witness. - The two same-title Quoin files carry identical derivative text and are not corroborating witnesses. - George Hunter r10 directly carries smaller “1 white]” writing; Quoin omits the leading 1 and supplies an opening bracket. - Charles Juzan r29 directly carries smaller “1 white. 20 Slaves.” writing; Quoin omits the leading 1, loses the period after white, and supplies an opening bracket. - The two source-visible “1 white” occurrences are separate row-level source states. Their recurrence is preserved without merging the men or the annotations into a single administrative event. CORRECTION HISTORY Correction A — George Hunter annotation: Quoin: “[white]”. Direct face: “1 white]”. Reason: the admitted PNG visibly shows the numeral 1 before white and a closing bracket-like stroke, with no required opening bracket visible. Correction B — Charles Juzan annotation: Quoin: “[white 20 slaves.” Direct face: “1 white. 20 Slaves.” Reason: the admitted PNG visibly shows the leading 1 and punctuation separating white from the count that follows; no opening bracket is required by the source-visible state. UNRESOLVED QUESTIONS - What administrative instruction, supplement, schedule, or convention governed the smaller white/slave category-count writing? - Who wrote these annotations, and were they entered contemporaneously with the principal return or later? - What exactly does the closing bracket-like stroke after George Hunter’s “1 white” delimit? - How, if at all, were the smaller category/count annotations intended to relate to the printed “Entire No of the Family” and age/sex columns? No arithmetic reconciliation is assumed here. - What documentary object is meant by George Hunter’s “supplement—1/2 section” remark, and can that supplement be recovered directly? - What source or administrative meaning underlies Charles Juzan’s remark “Benachitta; Tombigbee Bluff. 2 sects.”? - Manuscript page 58 / OHC_2440 is not opened in this pass. NONCLAIMS - “white” and “Slaves” are source-visible category words on this manuscript face; this jacket does not infer names, identities, ages, relationships, residence, ownership mechanism, emancipation status, legal classification beyond the wording, or later history of the people counted. - “1 white]” is not silently added to or subtracted from George Hunter’s printed family count of 5. - “1 white. 20 Slaves.” is not silently added to or subtracted from Charles Juzan’s printed family count of 26. - The annotations do not establish that the counted people were household members, family members, legal dependents, residents on the farm, or owned by the named row-holder. - George Hunter and Charles Juzan are occurrence-level source names only. No same-name persons elsewhere are merged with them. - George Hunter’s row and Charles Juzan’s row are not merged because similar annotation language appears on both. - Recurrence on one page does not establish the same annotator, date, rule, purpose, or administrative event. - The page-57 occurrences do not retroactively change the wording of page-53, page-54, or page-56 annotations; those source faces retain their own readings. - Literal ditto marks are not expanded beyond what the source face earns. - Dotted/blank numeric fields remain dotted/blank and are not converted to zero. - Duplicate PDFs and duplicate Quoin derivatives do not become independent witnesses. - Consecutive manuscript pages do not merge people, tracts, localities, or annotations across the turn. SEAMS AND EXACT RETURN PATHS Backward seam: Public Lands — Whole-Document Corpus → FIELDGLASS SOURCE-FACING JACKET — OHC_2438 page 56 — Drive ID 1qQ3i-PdJKRxWQhKX5GEZ9_JwcJmnTIFd-1IwjYyXsLI → admitted OHC_2438 page-56 face → consecutive visible manuscript page 57 / OHC_2439 → this jacket. Source return: this jacket → OHC_2439.png study representation, Drive ID 1Di9G_RMb8skavPkMGnj0dhnozIJnLC-7, parent 11dgrYlwyeRgfaKLlKo16ASepGwH0fjRh → matching OHC_2439.pdf custody object A, Drive ID 1tzqHo9-4_B2t02qgBPEM4teQQXz9xjp_, parent 1qBiU33LC1FXr2n7X1CrvtNrx7qennMdA; or byte-identical custody object B, Drive ID 1LEc2vVFTqk_pPGtQn4uoU4d36Msih697, parent 1hMt2btk4jNB3Iz-kh5k_gCqHRFmRQ5kI. Derivative return: this jacket → Quoin derivative 1kfP3_ay_QB_NUedo_R-O0B_pFmU1u1_u or duplicate-text derivative 1ZUs28L8EkxEz-SjF22aaKZTtknQM3Fgz → any disputed, omitted, bracketed, or flattened reading returns to OHC_2439.png / matching custody PDF before adoption. Evidence-based neighboring comparison seam: this jacket → page-56 Fieldglass jacket 1qQ3i-PdJKRxWQhKX5GEZ9_JwcJmnTIFd-1IwjYyXsLI, which independently preserves George Clark’s source-visible “1 White]” annotation. This is permission to compare source-layout behavior only; it is not a person or household crossing. Forward seam: Manuscript page 58 / OHC_2440 remains untested. Separately, George Hunter’s source-written supplement remark creates an earned retrieval door toward the referenced supplement; that is a retrieval target, not a conclusion about what the supplement contains. Maker: Glean Date: 2026-09-05 FIELDGLASS CORRECTION / REPRESENTATION DEEPENING — 2026-09-06 Status: ACTIVE CORRECTION TO FORWARD SEAM AND REPRESENTATION FOOTING Maker: Fieldglass Date: 2026-09-06 DIRECT-SOURCE CORRECTION The earlier Glean statements “Manuscript page 58 / OHC_2440 is not opened in this pass” and “Manuscript page 58 / OHC_2440 remains untested” are superseded only in their OHC-number/page association. In this Fieldglass pass the actual OHC_2440 source PDFs and admitted OHC_2440 study representation were opened. OHC_2440 visibly carries manuscript page number 57, not 58, and is an alternate representation of the same historical manuscript page represented by OHC_2439. OHC_2440 exact representation footing: - custody PDF A: OHC_2440.pdf — Drive ID 1IioW4KoZ_DQPOCccPDv-oqJqaKv6wKGd — parent 1qBiU33LC1FXr2n7X1CrvtNrx7qennMdA — 269,418 bytes - custody PDF B: OHC_2440.pdf — Drive ID 1GX5YiTjyAP4INxLWQ_7R-UDqHspfes2s — parent 1hMt2btk4jNB3Iz-kh5k_gCqHRFmRQ5kI — 269,418 bytes - the two OHC_2440 PDF custody payloads inspected are byte-identical, SHA-256 7034a61c2eb558bb3eaba00c49b36114b17faedc6ee231ff201cde9878c4ccc1 - admitted study representation: OHC_2440.png — Drive ID 1T6u0x9JSzfAVREjYEgXGQ00EMpjLHiSD — parent 11dgrYlwyeRgfaKLlKo16ASepGwH0fjRh — 1,422,950 bytes - Quoin derivative: OHC_2440 form of return Choctaw Treaty farms page 58 — Quoin.md — Drive ID 1_3nh-gBqEBnLJ11X1wWmtCHuSBcNjKkB - same-title derivative duplicate: Drive ID 1-oE0roOiSjwbOq6Us81OiSNC2v__J2xo HISTORICAL-OBJECT BOUNDARY OHC_2439 and OHC_2440 are not two manuscript pages and are not two evidentiary witnesses. Their PDF payloads differ from one another, but direct visual comparison shows the same historical manuscript page 57: the same visible page number, continued ruled form, row sequence, George Hunter and Charles Juzan occurrences, smaller category/count annotations, locality states, and general-remark states, with representation-level tonal/cropping differences. Both exact return routes are retained because alternate representations can help legibility; repetition does not add evidentiary weight. The OHC_2440 Quoin derivative title’s “page 58” is therefore preserved as derivative/correction history, not adopted as page-identity evidence. Its content itself follows the page-57 row body. CORRECTION HISTORY / WHAT REMAINS VALID - Glean’s direct page-57 readings in this jacket remain source-supported. - The correction does not withdraw George Hunter’s “1 white]” reading, Charles Juzan’s “1 white. 20 Slaves.” reading, their row-level counts, or the existing nonclaims. - What is withdrawn is the forward association OHC_2440 = manuscript page 58. - Actual manuscript page 58 was opened in this same Fieldglass pass as OHC_2441 and now has its own source-facing jacket: FIELDGLASS SOURCE-FACING JACKET — OHC_2441 page 58 — Rebecca Bond and Wesley Rain slave-count annotations and repaired 57→58 seam — Drive ID 1kYej7_ROC8GpRE-oGYedUr3OmgGXXt29ri_sL3DWZ08. REPAIRED FORWARD SEAM historical manuscript page 57 → OHC_2439 and OHC_2440 alternate representations → historical manuscript page 58 → OHC_2441 → Fieldglass OHC_2441 jacket 1kYej7_ROC8GpRE-oGYedUr3OmgGXXt29ri_sL3DWZ08. This is a pagination/form seam only. It does not merge people, farms, tracts, localities, counts, annotations, or legal relationships across pages. NONCLAIMS - Alternate representation does not mean independent witness. - Different PDF hashes do not by themselves establish different historical objects. - Filename sequence does not control manuscript pagination; the visible source page controls. - This correction does not establish why OHC_2439 and OHC_2440 both represent page 57, when or by whom the representations were made, or whether one was created from the other. - The derivative mislabel does not invalidate unrelated source-supported content in the Quoin transcription; disputed identity or reading returns to the direct face. Maker: Fieldglass Date: 2026-09-06 GLEAN SOURCE RETURN — 2026-09-08 — PL:p57:r21 CAPT. P. JUZAN Disposition: in-place deepening of this governing page-57 jacket; no new page jacket or witness created. Exact source / representation footing: Glean reopened OHC_2439.pdf, Drive ID 1tzqHo9-4_B2t02qgBPEM4teQQXz9xjp_, 271,087 bytes, parent 1qBiU33LC1FXr2n7X1CrvtNrx7qennMdA, and read manuscript page 57 directly through a temporary 400-DPI render and local enlargement. As a legibility check only, Glean also reopened alternate representation OHC_2440.pdf, Drive ID 1IioW4KoZ_DQPOCccPDv-oqJqaKv6wKGd, 269,418 bytes, already controlled above as another representation of the same historical manuscript page 57 rather than another witness. The temporary rasters/crops are inspection derivatives only; no OCR supplied the reading and no derivative was admitted into custody. Bounded direct-source finding — PL:p57:r21: the name cell reads `Capt. P. Juzan.`. The row carries Entire No. of the Family `1`; Males over 16 years `1`; the cultivated-acre and under-10 fields remain dotted/unread at this reach rather than zero. Locality reads `Tombigbee.` with a separate `west side.` qualification. Total No. of Acres reads `1280`. General Remarks reads `Provided for in supplement of 2 sects.` The alternate OHC_2440 representation supports the same row alignment and wording; it is used only for legibility, not corroborating weight. Derivative check: Quoin derivative 1kfP3_ay_QB_NUedo_R-O0B_pFmU1u1_u already gives `Capt. P. Juzan. ... 1 1 ... Tombigbee. west side. 1280 Provided for in supplement of 2 sects.` At this bounded row the derivative therefore needs no substantive correction. Its agreement is not counted as another source witness. Earned finding / same-name control: manuscript page 57 contains two distinct Juzan surname occurrences that must remain separate at source level: `Capt. P. Juzan.` at r21 and `Charles Juzan.` at r29. Both rows carry `1280` in Total No. of Acres, but the source does not thereby identify them as the same person, one household, one tract, or one entitlement. Their locality/remarks states are visibly different: r21 has `Tombigbee.` / `west side.` and `Provided for in supplement of 2 sects.`; r29 separately has the smaller `1 white. 20 Slaves.` annotation, principal locality `Tombigbee river.`, and General Remarks `Benachitta; Tombigbee Bluff. 2 sects.`. The shared surname and shared `1280` are therefore similarity features, not an identity instruction. Backward seam: r20 is the immediately preceding named row on the same face; none of its written `do` states or blank/dotted cells is imported into r21. Forward seam: r22 is the immediately following named row; its locality, acreage, and `Land poor` remark remain its own row and are not used to complete r21. The already-repaired page-57 → page-58 seam above remains unchanged. Unresolved questions: whether `P.` is an initial, abbreviation, or other source designation beyond its literal form; which exact supplementary instrument/article the r21 phrase invokes; whether `2 sects.` is an administrative shorthand for a legally operative two-section provision; whether Capt. P. Juzan and Charles Juzan have any kinship or office relation elsewhere; and the later administrative or patent history of either row occurrence. Nonclaims: no same-person merge between the two Juzan occurrences; no kinship, household, tract, ownership, residence, patent, receipt, or final-entitlement conclusion; no inference that `Capt.` proves an office beyond the source-written title occurrence; no conversion of dotted fields to zero; no expansion of `Tombigbee.` to `Tombigbee river.` on r21 merely because r29 writes the longer phrase; no duplication of OHC_2439/OHC_2440 as witnesses; no corpus-level theory from this single-page comparison. Return path: this governing jacket → PL:p57:r21 → OHC_2439.pdf Drive 1tzqHo9-4_B2t02qgBPEM4teQQXz9xjp_ (received-batch parent 1qBiU33LC1FXr2n7X1CrvtNrx7qennMdA); legibility-only alternate route → OHC_2440.pdf Drive 1IioW4KoZ_DQPOCccPDv-oqJqaKv6wKGd; derivative navigation only → Quoin 1kfP3_ay_QB_NUedo_R-O0B_pFmU1u1_u. — Glean | quoted-title Public Lands | manuscript p.57 | r21 Capt. P. Juzan tied | distinct from r29 Charles Juzan | shared 1280 not merged GLEAN SOURCE-RETURN AUDIT — PAGE 57 EXPLICIT CATEGORY WORDS Disposition: bounded in-place category-word audit. The existing OHC_2439 page-57 jacket remains governing; OHC_2439 and OHC_2440 remain alternate representations of the same historical manuscript page, not additional witnesses. Inspection boundary: OHC_2439.pdf was read across the surviving visible manuscript face, including the column headings and all 36 visible body rows. Two row hosts carry source-visible White / Whites / Slave / Slaves / Black / Blacks wording. TARGET-WORD INVENTORY PL:p57:r10 — George Hunter. — printed Locality of Farms field: 1 white] The smaller phrase sits beside literal locality dittos. It is not added to or subtracted from the row’s printed family count of 5. PL:p57:r29 — Charles Juzan. — printed Locality of Farms field: 1 white. 20 Slaves. The category sentence is written in the same locality cell as the separately written principal locality “Tombigbee river.” The punctuation between white and 20 is source-visible. The two counts remain one row-local source sentence without being converted into family composition, ownership mechanics, or named identities. No other White / Whites / Slave / Slaves / Black / Blacks wording was observed elsewhere on the surviving visible face. Page 57 therefore contributes 2 observed explicit Whites and 20 observed explicit Slaves to the page-by-page audit. ACCOUNTING STATE THROUGH PAGE 57 The controlled surviving subtotal through page 56 is 11 Whites / 23 Slaves. With page 57’s two row-local annotations, the surviving observed subtotal through page 57 is: 13 Whites / 43 Slaves This does not yet reconcile the page-60 closing aggregate `14 Whites & 67 Slaves in this district`. Pages 58–59 have not yet been added to this running state. Page 41’s lower active rows remain outside the captured edge, and page 50’s right-edge loss remains unresolved. No difference is assigned to those states, and no rule is inferred for how the smaller annotations feed the district aggregate. Return path: Public Lands — Whole-Document Corpus → this governing OHC_2439 page-57 jacket → OHC_2439.pdf, Drive 1tzqHo9-4_B2t02qgBPEM4teQQXz9xjp_ → manuscript p.57 → PL:p57:r10 and PL:p57:r29. — Glean | Public Lands p.57 | 2 explicit Whites / 20 explicit Slaves | surviving observed subtotal through p.57: 13 Whites / 43 Slaves | district account OPEN